|
The
purpose of the Myers Park Homeowners Association is
to preserve and enhance the historical character and quality of life envisioned in the
original garden park design for Myers Park.
I am
often asked why and how Myers Park Homeowners Association was formed and what our
mission is or should be. It is helpful to look back and remember why this
association came to be.
The
association was formed in the 1970's in response to the action of City Council
to rezone property on Dartmouth, Colonial, Hermitage Ct. and Amherst from single
family to multi-family. City leaders and planners determined at the time that
those streets should be developed with apartments. Alarmed that the
single-family bungalows on these streets might be lost and concerned about
increased density, a number of neighbors formed a committee to lobby the City
Council to reconsider this policy. Because of the work of the Association, the
City Council agreed to reverse its actions and rezone the property as single
family. After the zoning victory, the committee continued to meet and discuss
issues confronting the neighborhood.
The
association was legally incorporated in 1984 with the stated mission of
preserving the original, historic layout of Myers Park and thereby preserving
the value of its stock of single-family homes. The Board of Directors of the
Homeowners Association is a group of volunteers which meets monthly to discuss
issues confronting the approximately 3300 single-family and multi-family
residential property owners in what is now considered "Myers Park.”
Approximately 650 to 700 homeowners have joined the association. At our 2-3
hour board meetings, we try to deal with the most pressing issues facing the
neighborhood. These are long, tedious meetings, and I am grateful that 25 or so
neighbors are willing to spare one night a month to discuss neighborhood
business. Between meetings, board members attempt to follow up with the board's
preferences on various issues and to deal with new issues that arise between
meetings.
A
portion of the neighborhood is listed on the National Historic Register. It was
listed on the register because of its unique and attractive layout, curving
streets, tree plantings and landscape design emphasizing green space, all of
which were revolutionary in 1915 and later copied
throughout the country.
Compare the square grid of streets in most of the Dilworth and Elizabeth
neighborhoods to the curving streets of Myers Park. The layout and plan for
green space was to be preserved through the restrictions placed on the property
by the original developers, the Stephens Company.
Unfortunately, through the last two decades, the Board has had to deal from time
to time with violations of the deed restrictions placed on Myers Park by the
Stephens Company. Most often the violations were not created by existing
neighbors but by developers constructing speculative projects and trying to
maximize square footage. The economic downturn has reduced this somewhat.
Nevertheless, this does take a great deal of our time and energy.
Some
neighbors feel that we are too strict and are needlessly unfriendly in our
efforts to enforce deed restrictions. I agree that we spend more time than we
should have to dealing with development issues. Understandably the landowners
who violate the restrictions do not like to be limited in their construction
plans, and they often are not happy with our efforts. However, the effort to
preserve the viability of the restrictions is consistent with the mission for
which this Association was created. Further, given the zoning policies in
Charlotte and the defeat of the historic district effort, the deed restrictions
are the primary tools we have to preserve the planned lay-out of Myers Park and
deal with over-development.
Importantly, we cannot afford to allow violations to go unchallenged. If the
deed restrictions are not enforced in the face of violations, they will become
unenforceable over time.
I feel
comfortable speaking for the board when I say that we would much rather spend
our time doing other things to support the neighborhood than argue about deed
restrictions. However, deed restrictions and development issues are directly
tied to the mission of the association as set out in its Articles of
Incorporation in 1984. I do not believe the Board should stop working on these
issues unless the association re-writes its Articles to remove the issue of
preservation from its stated charge.
In the
past, the association has attempted to organize events in the neighborhood,
e.g., bridge clubs, dinner clubs and, for two years, the association sponsored a
May Day. Those events were not successful. Perhaps they would be now. The
biggest challenge to putting on such events, as you can imagine, is sufficient
volunteer time.
The Board
works throughout the year on many issues other than zoning or deed violations.
During the 2003-2004 year the board has: worked with Christ Episcopal Church to
address neighbors’ concerns regarding church expansion; worked with the City to
partner in the construction of any new bus shelters in the neighborhood to match
the traditional stone-and-shingles shelter; began discussions with the City and
charitable groups using the neighborhood for walks, runs and bike rides to put
policies in place to lessen the impact on the neighborhood; met with
representatives of Queens University about their expansion plans; worked with
Colony Rd. neighbors regarding their new roundabout; worked with the City
regarding a proposed new library branch on Providence Rd. (which plans now
appear abandoned); and worked with Carolinas Medical Center regarding its
expansion plans behind homes on Kings Dr. Lastly, everyone recognizes the value
of the old oaks that shade Myers Park. We have collected separate funds to
support the tree canopy in the neighborhood and continued to work with the City
concerning its efforts to renovate the medians through our neighborhood.
We want to keep this effort an important part of our mission.
Cameron Furr,
Former President of the
Myer Park Homeowners Association
|